Terravo

Independent screening of rice methane credits (VM0051)

Check a rice carbon credit before you buy it.

Name the rice project you are considering. Within five business days you get a two-page verdict with evidence appendices: what holds up against the VM0051 methodology, what is not evidenced, how the claimed volume compares with an independent recalculation, and the questions to put to the developer before you commit.

Based on public documents and open satellite data. Nothing is requested from the developer.

Illustrative
Project Screening Report
Project X, a fictional VM0051 rice project · illustrative sample
5 flags2 not evidenced3 pass2 notes
Document audit against VM0051
Simplified approach: clusters tested by instance centres only; two instances within 1 km together exceed the 60,000 t limitFlag
Nitrous oxide deduction: co-benefit only, not calculatedFlag
Baseline: three-year look-back not shownNot evidenced
Internal arithmetic: the year-by-year table matches the stated totalPass
Area, boundary and volume
Claimed area is 41% of mapped cropland inside two instance boundariesPass
About 5.6 tCO2e per hectare on average, 7.6 at full enrolment; benchmark 4 to 6Flag
Questions to put to the developer: 10, ready to send. Appendices A–E: clause cross-reference, volume at risk, satellite evidence, market, excerpts.

Page 1 of the illustrative sample, condensed. The project is fictional; the full PDF is below.

Who it is for

Anyone about to put money on a rice project

What you get

Two-page summary, five appendices

The summary gives the verdict, six checks and the questions. The appendices carry the evidence: the methodology clause behind each check, an independent recalculation of the claimed volume, satellite maps and charts, the market table, and quoted excerpts with page numbers. A flag is a question, not a verdict.

  1. Verdict for a buyerThe counts, and one paragraph on what matters most: usually delivery risk, not area.
  2. Document audit against VM0051Quantification approach and its size limit, nitrous oxide deduction, baseline, uncertainty deduction, warming potential values, internal arithmetic, registry record.
  3. Area, boundary and volumeClaimed area against mapped cropland inside the published boundary, whether the boundary file is usable, and volume per hectare against the published benchmark.
  4. Monitoring and satellite observationsHow water management is recorded, and what open radar data shows around the project start.
  5. Position among all VM0051 projectsVolume, area, volume per hectare and stage, compared with every other listed project.
  6. Questions to put to the developerNumbered and ready to send as they are.

Sample report (illustrative)

Project X is fictional. Each finding follows a pattern we found in public VM0051 documents in October 2026, and the rules cited are real. A commissioned report on a real project has the same structure, with exact figures and page references.

Fixed fee, from USD 3,000 per project.Quoted before we start; nothing is charged until you confirm.

Download the sample report (PDF) Free: the two-page screen of nine VM0051 projects (PDF), projects identified by country only.

Process

How it works

  1. Name the projectEmail the registry ID or the name of the rice project. We confirm the same day what the public record allows us to check.
  2. We check the public recordProject documents, registry entries, the published boundary and open satellite data, against the methodology. No contact with the developer is needed.
  3. Verdict and appendices within five business daysDelivered as a PDF, with a short call if you want to walk through it. Fixed fee from USD 3,000, agreed before we start.

Why screen before you buy

The first credits have only just been issued

In early October 2026 we screened the nine projects then listed under VM0051. On 12 October Verra approved the first VM0051 credits, for the India project marked * below: 211,403 t verified for July 2022 to May 2025, from 20,602 farmers on 17,422 ha. The registry still shows its first estimate, 1,375 t a year on 40,000 ha. 13 more VM0051 projects are under development or in validation, and forward purchases have already been announced. The five listed after our screen are not in the chart.

Five projects estimate more than 60,000 tCO2e a year in total, the issued one included. That alone settles nothing: the limit binds only the simplified quantification approach, and it applies to each project activity instance and cluster, grouped project or not. Read against their drafts, one of the other four names no approach and is a single instance far above the limit; one uses the simplified approach only while under it; one switches to national factors above it; and one measures and models instead. Five report areas that do not reconcile with their volumes. Monitoring is largely self-reported. None of this is a finding against any project; each is a question that is cheaper to ask before the contract than after.

Project totals against the 60,000 t lineAnnual reductions per project, tCO2e a year: registry estimates; * verified 2024
60,000 t ceiling for the
simplified approach
Viet Nam
590,682
India
566,547
Philippines
359,146
India
178,820
India
109,251*
Myanmar
59,738
Thailand
54,645
Indonesia
53,142
Brazil
46,461
0200k400k600k

Source: Verra registry and Berkeley Carbon Trading Project offsets database, v2026-06. * The issued project, from its monitoring report: 109,251 t in 2024 from four project activity instances, each under the 60,000 t limit. The limit is tested per instance and cluster, and only for the simplified approach.

Limits

What this is not

Request a screening

Email the registry ID or name of the project. We confirm what we can check, then deliver within five business days. The two-page screen of nine VM0051 projects is free; just ask.

contact@terravo.io Select the address or use the button.